Blinded On Parody

Citation Format: TXT RIS BIB

Include abstract

(2026). Blinded On Parody. IHYA

Abstract: Ontological Arguments are arguments that try to argue from the concept of God to his existence, generally without the need of any other consideration. A common way of demonstrating their absurdity has been to appeal to parody ontological arguments. In this paper, I consider one such ontological argument namely the Modal Ontological Argument, and show that it is immune to parody versions. I argue two things; first, there is a crucial asymmetry between parody versions and the Modal ontological argument, and second, even if successful, parody versions provide further support for the conclusion of the traditional modal ontological argument. I make use of Ibn Sina’s distinction between mere Modal Necessity and Ontological Necessity.						

(2026). Blinded On Parody. IHYA						

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Blinded On Parody
PY  - 2026
JO  - IHYA
AB  - Ontological Arguments are arguments that try to argue from the concept of God to his existence, generally without the need of any other consideration. A common way of demonstrating their absurdity has been to appeal to parody ontological arguments. In this paper, I consider one such ontological argument namely the Modal Ontological Argument, and show that it is immune to parody versions. I argue two things; first, there is a crucial asymmetry between parody versions and the Modal ontological argument, and second, even if successful, parody versions provide further support for the conclusion of the traditional modal ontological argument. I make use of Ibn Sina’s distinction between mere Modal Necessity and Ontological Necessity.
ER  -						

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Blinded On Parody
PY  - 2026
JO  - IHYA
ER  -						

@article{67dfa026aafa0fad2cf29001190539bd,
  title = {Blinded On Parody},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {IHYA},
  abstract = {Ontological Arguments are arguments that try to argue from the concept of God to his existence, generally without the need of any other consideration. A common way of demonstrating their absurdity has been to appeal to parody ontological arguments. In this paper, I consider one such ontological argument namely the Modal Ontological Argument, and show that it is immune to parody versions. I argue two things; first, there is a crucial asymmetry between parody versions and the Modal ontological argument, and second, even if successful, parody versions provide further support for the conclusion of the traditional modal ontological argument. I make use of Ibn Sina’s distinction between mere Modal Necessity and Ontological Necessity.}
}						

@article{67dfa026aafa0fad2cf29001190539bd,
  title = {Blinded On Parody},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {IHYA}
}